All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Remco Poelstra <remco.poelstra@duran-audio.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add support for LPC2468 from NXP
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:39:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C07785E.1060900@duran-audio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100602100341.899FEAFC6B7@gemini.denx.de>

Hi,

On 02-06-10 12:03, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/lpc24xx/iap_entry.S b/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/lpc24xx/iap_entry.S
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..c31d519
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/lpc24xx/iap_entry.S
>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>> +IAP_ADDRESS:	.word	0x7FFFFFF1
>> +
>> +.globl iap_entry
>> +iap_entry:
>> +	ldr	r2, IAP_ADDRESS
>> +	bx	r2
>> +	mov	pc, lr
>>      
> Verbatim copy of arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/lpc2292/iap_entry.S - please
> unify.
>
>    

Looking at other architectures for inspiration to solve the above 
problem, I find that it's common practice to not-share common code 
between SOC's. Is there a reason for that?
Furthermore I see the same problems with some code using direct register 
access and other almost identical code using C-structure based access. 
Maybe these SOC's are in the same process of getting converted to 
C-structures?
Main point: What do you want me to do? I fixed the other minor comments, 
so I can send a new patch if you want.


Regards,

Remco Poelstra

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-03  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-12  7:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add support for LPC2468 from NXP Remco Poelstra
2010-05-12  9:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-05-12 13:01 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Remco Poelstra
2010-05-12 13:36   ` Remco Poelstra
2010-05-12 16:09     ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-05-18  7:39       ` Remco Poelstra
2010-05-18  7:53         ` Anatolij Gustschin
2010-05-17  7:11     ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] " Remco Poelstra
2010-05-17 12:21     ` Remco Poelstra
2010-05-21  6:58       ` Remco Poelstra
2010-06-02  8:42       ` Remco Poelstra
2010-06-02 10:03       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-06-02 11:48         ` Remco Poelstra
2010-06-21 20:08           ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-06-03  9:39         ` Remco Poelstra [this message]
2010-06-08  7:04         ` Remco Poelstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C07785E.1060900@duran-audio.com \
    --to=remco.poelstra@duran-audio.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.