From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36? Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:20:06 -0700 Message-ID: <4C099836.1050903@goop.org> References: <20100604223929.GA8819@orion.carnet.hr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100604223929.GA8819@orion.carnet.hr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Josip Rodin Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/04/2010 03:39 PM, Josip Rodin wrote: > What about the future? I saw Konrad's applied his swiotlb tree with the > right acks for inclusion into linux-next, so that looks like it's planned > to be ready to go in when the .36 merge window opens, right? > Yes, and I'm hoping we can get pcifront and pvhvm lined up for .36; with those in place, its a short jump to full dom0 functionality (which, no promises, might also get into .36 on their tails). Then the backend drivers will be the next hurdle. Plain blkback is probably fairly straightforward, and netback can probably got upsteamable with a small amount of effort. But blktap2 and netchannel2 are pretty questionable at this point. ACPI power management will also need another round of attention. J