All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: rework remove-write-access for a slot
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:04:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0BC709.5040307@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C08B5D0.6090104@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 06/04/2010 11:14 AM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
>
>> - I thought of a different approach to write protection: write protect
>> the L4 sptes, on write fault add write permission to the L4 spte and
>> write protect the L3 sptes that it points to, etc.  This method can use
>> the slot bitmap to reduce the number of write faults.  However we can
>> reintroduce the slot bitmap if/when we use the method, this shouldn't
>> block the patch.
>>      
> It is very a good approach and it is blazing fast.
>
> I have no time to implement it currently,
> could you update it into the TODO list?
>    

Done.

>>> +static void rmapp_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long
>>> *rmapp)
>>> +{
>>> +    u64 *spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, NULL);
>>> +
>>> +    while (spte) {
>>> +        /* avoid RMW */
>>> +        if (is_writable_pte(*spte))
>>> +            *spte&= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
>>>        
>> Must use an atomic operation here to avoid losing dirty or accessed bit.
>>
>>      
> Atomic operation is too expensive, I retained the comment "/* avoid RMW */"
> and wait someone take a good approach for it.
>    

You are right, it is an existing problem.  I just posted a patchset 
which fixes the problem, when it's merged please rebase on top.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-06 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-02  8:53 [PATCH] kvm: rework remove-write-access for a slot Lai Jiangshan
2010-06-02 11:18 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-04  8:14   ` Lai Jiangshan
2010-06-04 15:18     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-06 16:04     ` Avi Kivity [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C0BC709.5040307@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.