From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michal Novotny Subject: Re: make xen/stable-2.6.32.x pvops branch the default? Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:19:21 +0200 Message-ID: <4C0E2739.3040105@redhat.com> References: <20100608111501.GP17817@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100608111501.GP17817@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/08/2010 01:15 PM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > Hello, > > Should we switch xen/stable-2.6.32.x to be the default branch in xen-un= stable? > And possibly in xen-4.0-testing.hg aswell? > > That's the long-term maintained and the branch most people are using an= yway.. > > -- Pasi > =20 Hi Pasi, I'm using the default branch which is stable-2.6.31.x now but if the=20 long-term maintained one would be the .32.x one I think it's better to=20 have it as default since sooner or later I'll have to recompile the=20 .32.x version since .31.x won't be maintained so make it a default for=20 at least xen-4.1-unstable and newer versions of xen-unstable could be a=20 good idea not to force other to clone/pull and recompile the another=20 branch than the default one. Thanks, Michal > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > =20 --=20 Michal Novotny, RHCE Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat