From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: Re: make xen/stable-2.6.32.x pvops branch the	default?
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:38:16 -0700
Message-ID: <4C0E71F8.4050401@goop.org>
References: <20100608111501.GP17817@reaktio.net> <4C0E667F.2040306@goop.org>
	<20100608161545.GB4900@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100608161545.GB4900@phenom.dumpdata.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 06/08/2010 09:15 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On top of that, what about that udev(new version) race condition? I
> think James and Bastian both provided a patch - does it make sense to
> merge it in both branches (.31 and .32)?
>   

I've got James' patch in .32 at the moment.  I was about to apply
Bastien's fix, but Jan raised some comments, but Bastien didn't reply. 
So I stared into space for a while.

I'd like to get a definitive fix that everyone agrees on.

Is there also a problem in .31?  Is it triggered by a new udev rather
than a kernel version?

    J