From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [PATCH 47/58] convert exofs to ->evict_inode() Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:09:07 +0300 Message-ID: <4C0F7653.9080207@panasas.com> References: <4C0F5960.6090305@panasas.com> <20100609100213.GC15403@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Al Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from daytona.panasas.com ([67.152.220.89]:7294 "EHLO daytona.int.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757332Ab0FILJL (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2010 07:09:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100609100213.GC15403@lst.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/09/2010 01:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:05:36PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On 06/09/2010 01:22 AM, Al Viro wrote: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Al Viro >> >> Al hi. >> >> This patch is nice off course, but it clashes with a patch >> I was intending to push to linux-next today. (For 2.6.36 kernel) >> >> The patch is the one to convert to the new truncate sequence: >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127539189718732&w=2 >> >> In fact I was meaning to ask you if you could take this patch >> through your tree, so Christoph could base his cleanup on this >> as well. > > The new truncate sequence bits already are in Al's tree. And as > I said a few times before life would really be a lot simpler if > you just base things ontop of that. It makes the API for the > file system a lot better. > Will do. Patch based on vfs/for-next posted as reply. (Please review?) Al's patch thing still holds, Al? Boaz