All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc2, CONFIG_RPS is filling the dmesg log
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:22:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0FB1D3.60901@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276090953.2442.140.camel@edumazet-laptop>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2011 bytes --]

On 06/09/2010 07:42 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 09 juin 2010 à 07:27 -0600, Tim Gardner a écrit :
>> On 06/08/2010 02:55 PM, Tim Gardner wrote:
>>> With 2.6.35-rc2 my dmesg log is being flooded with messages like this:
>>>
>>> br0 received packet on queue 4, but number of RX queues is 1
>>>
>>> This machine is bridged for KVM and has 2 igb network adapters.
>>>
>>> The root cause appears to be CONFIG_RPS=y and the fact that none of the
>>> drivers that call skb_record_rx_queue() perform their net device
>>> allocation using alloc_netdev_mq(), thereby initializing num_rx_queues
>>> to a maximum of 1.
>>>
>>> Given that this is early RPS days, is the warning in get_rps_cpu()
>>> really necessary? It would appear that _all_ of the multi-receive queue
>>> devices that call skb_record_rx_queue() will cause this log noise.
>>>
>>> By the way, how do you turn off CONFIG_RPS? The only way I could get it
>>> disabled was to change the default in net/Kconfig to 'n'.
>>>
>>> rtg
>>
>> This is the route that I'm taking with Ubuntu in the short term. I'll
>> have lots of server testers complaining pretty soon if I don't take care
>> of this now. It does keep my server logs from filling.
>>
>> rtg
>>
>
> Probably fine, but your commit message is not exact :
>
>    So far no users of skb_record_rx_queue() use alloc_netdev_mq() for
>    network device initialization, so don't print a warning about num_rx_queues
>    imbalances in get_rps_cpu() unless they have actually been allocated.
>
> In fact, drivers that use skb_record_rx_queue() did use alloc_netdev_mq().
>
> Problem is : packets going thru bridge/bonding that are not yet
> multiqueue enabled. If R[PF]S enabled for these "virtual devices",
> we trigger the get_rps_cpu() warning.
>
> Also, in a bonding setup, we still have a problem
> because all tx packets will go thru tx queue 0 (dev_pick_tx() job)
>
> (That might be good to know that for Ubuntu server testers)
>

How about this?

-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-UBUNTU-SAUCE-net-Print-num_rx_queues-imbalance-warni.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1443 bytes --]

>From ad76786a1a0c7b7b3c9bfeb4116fa0e2742f6328 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 17:51:27 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] net: Print num_rx_queues imbalance warning only when there are allocated queues

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591416

There are a number of network drivers (bridge, bonding, etc) that are not yet
receive multi-queue enabled and use alloc_netdev(), so don't print a
num_rx_queues imbalance warning in that case.

Also, only print the warning once for those drivers that _are_ multi-queue
enabled.

Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
---
 net/core/dev.c |    8 +++-----
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index d03470f..14a8568 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2253,11 +2253,9 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb)) {
 		u16 index = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
 		if (unlikely(index >= dev->num_rx_queues)) {
-			if (net_ratelimit()) {
-				pr_warning("%s received packet on queue "
-					"%u, but number of RX queues is %u\n",
-					dev->name, index, dev->num_rx_queues);
-			}
+			WARN_ONCE(dev->num_rx_queues > 1, "%s received packet "
+				"on queue %u, but number of RX queues is %u\n",
+				dev->name, index, dev->num_rx_queues);
 			goto done;
 		}
 		rxqueue = dev->_rx + index;
-- 
1.7.0.4


  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-09 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-08 20:55 2.6.35-rc2, CONFIG_RPS is filling the dmesg log Tim Gardner
2010-06-09 13:27 ` Tim Gardner
2010-06-09 13:42   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 15:22     ` Tim Gardner [this message]
2010-06-09 15:27       ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C0FB1D3.60901@canonical.com \
    --to=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.