From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHEs]: support more than 32 VCPUs in guests
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:44:02 -0700
Message-ID: <4C102742.3010108@goop.org>
References: <20100609160920.1445fbbe@mantra.us.oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100609160920.1445fbbe@mantra.us.oracle.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 06/09/2010 04:09 PM, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> Jeremy, pv ops is OK as it is on 128 vcpus, but I reworked the 
> xen_vcpu_setup() a little to address more than 32vcpus on xen that
> doesn't have vcpu placement. Please take a look.
>   

Why BUG_ON if the number of cpus is too high?  Why not just ignore the
excess ones?

    J