From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC764B7D43 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:25:47 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4C10AF92.9060400@grandegger.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:25:38 +0200 From: Wolfgang Grandegger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Fietze Subject: Re: CAN Subsystem and MPC52xx onboard controller References: <201006101041.27926.roman.fietze@telemotive.de> In-Reply-To: <201006101041.27926.roman.fietze@telemotive.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 06/10/2010 10:41 AM, Roman Fietze wrote: > Hello List Members, > > I have tried multiple versions/branches and git repos (torvalds, > benh/{next,master}, denx, pengutronix, ...) to get a 2.6.34 or HEAD > version of that repos that compiles w/o errors when the CAN subsystem > is enabled and the MPC5xxx onboard driver is selected starting with > the lite5200b_defconfig. > > Until now I'm out of luck. If other's also have compile problems I can > of course offer to try to dig into the sources. Hm, kernel.org's "linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2" builds here just fine with lite5200b_defconfig and Socket-CAN support enabled for the MSCAN. I can imaging that there are issues with more recent "-rc" versions due to Grant's OF platform device generalization. Also the DTS entries entries for MSCAN in lite5200b.dts seem OK. > Q0: > > I'm somewhat unsure what repos to use in general to develop using the > 2.6 on a Lite5200B compatible board (for the 2.4 we always used the > DENX repos). Please use the mainline kernel for that board. Wolfgang.