From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Brian Gordon <legerde@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Aerospace and linux
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:46:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C11330A.4040309@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik3XiOjYM67RdPG-3RM3rY-0vondiMmJsETAHfX@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/10/2010 12:38 PM, Brian Gordon wrote:
> On the more exotic end, I have also seen systems that have dual
> redundant processors / memories. Then they add compare logic between
> the redundant processors that compare most pins each clock cycle. If
> any pins are not identical at a clock cycle, then something has gone
> wrong (SEU, hardware failure, etc..)
Some phone switches do this. Some of them also have at least two copies
of everything in memory and will do transactional operations that can be
rolled back if there is a hardware glitch.
> So, some pages of RAM are going to be read-only and the data in those
> pages came from some source (file system?). Can anyone describe a
> high level strategy to occasionaly provide some coverage of this data?
> So far I have thought about page descriptors adding an MD5 hash
> whenever they are read-only and first being "loaded/mapped?" and then
> a background daemon could occasionaly verify.
Makes sense to me. You might also pick an on-disk format with extra
checksumming so you could compare the on-disk checksum with the
in-memory checksum.
Chris
--
The author works for GENBAND Corporation (GENBAND) who is solely
responsible for this email and its contents. All enquiries regarding
this email should be addressed to GENBAND. Nortel has provided the use
of the nortel.com domain to GENBAND in connection with this email solely
for the purpose of connectivity and Nortel Networks Inc. has no
liability for the email or its contents. GENBAND's web site is
http://www.genband.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-10 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-10 17:29 Aerospace and linux Brian Gordon
2010-06-10 18:23 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-10 18:38 ` Brian Gordon
2010-06-10 18:46 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2010-06-10 19:14 ` Brian Gordon
2010-06-10 18:48 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-13 8:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-06-10 18:27 ` Chris Friesen
2010-06-10 18:42 ` Brian Gordon
2010-06-10 19:23 ` Massimiliano Galanti
2010-06-10 19:37 ` Brian Gordon
2010-06-10 19:42 ` Brian Gordon
2010-06-10 19:52 ` Massimiliano Galanti
2010-06-10 20:12 ` Brian Gordon
2010-06-10 19:59 ` Massimiliano Galanti
2010-06-11 14:37 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-13 15:26 Denys Fedorysychenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C11330A.4040309@nortel.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=legerde@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.