From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phillip Susi Subject: Re: 2 TB wraparound on snapshots Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:03:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4C14043B.7080203@cfl.rr.com> References: <4C12A32C.3000501@cfl.rr.com> <1276290990.2862.161.camel@mulgrave.site> <4C13AB90.1070802@cfl.rr.com> <1276358598.4399.3.camel@mulgrave.site> <1276358949.4399.8.camel@mulgrave.site> <4C13CAD6.70902@cfl.rr.com> <4C13D65B.7010800@cfl.rr.com> <1276373001.4399.11.camel@mulgrave.site> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1276373001.4399.11.camel@mulgrave.site> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 06/12/2010 04:03 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > So do you have a 64 bit system (like an amd64) that you can try this > with? If it only occurs on the i686 system, then it's likely a long to > sector conversion bug somewhere in the snapshot code. If it occurs on > both, there's some 2TB limit coded directly into snapshots. As I said before, it occurs on both.