From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4C1648AD.5020607@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:20:13 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, hweight: Fix UML boot crash References: <201005271944.09541.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> <201006141544.59500.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> <201006141711.26975.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <201006141711.26975.toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9yYWxmIEbDtnJzdGVy?= Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Borislav Petkov , Borislav Petkov , "user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-ID: On 06/14/2010 08:11 AM, Toralf Förster wrote: > > Geert Uytterhoeven wrote at 16:39:00 >> I assume you did a `make clean' in between? > ... >> BTW, I'm also using ccache. Always. Ever. All my (cross)compilers are > Well, I'm unsure - might be I made that mistake, especially b/c I use ccache > too since years and didn't experienced any fault so far. I have certainly seen a number of cases where ccache doesn't pick up sublte differences, for reasons unknown. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.