From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4C165BCF.4030507@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:41:51 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH resend] um, hweight: Fix UML boot crash References: <4C0F4B00.4090307@panasas.com> <4C0F4C40.5020207@panasas.com> <4C0FDD8C.2020704@zytor.com> <4C1653FF.3080108@panasas.com> In-Reply-To: <4C1653FF.3080108@panasas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Borislav Petkov , =?UTF-8?B?VG9yYWxmIEbDtnJzdGVy?= , uml-devel , linux-kernel , Jeff Dike , Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" List-ID: On 06/14/2010 09:08 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 06/09/2010 09:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 06/09/2010 01:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> >>> Peter, are you happy with this? >>> Although we still don't know why UML cannot grok it, it does fix a >>> regression in post-2.6.34. >>> >> >> Yes, I'll push it. >> >> -hpa > > Peter hi. > > Why have we missed that patch from -rc3. This is so *not fun* to keep > out-of-tree patches. Specially when working with lots of other people's > trees. > > Please push it ASAP > Boaz We made the decision of not pushing our queue for -rc3 because Linus specifically wanted only critical fixes for -rc3. We will push it for -rc4 for when Linus returns. Also, you may want to consider moderating your tone. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.