From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4C167289.9040909@panasas.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:18:49 +0300 From: Boaz Harrosh MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH resend] um, hweight: Fix UML boot crash References: <4C0F4B00.4090307@panasas.com> <4C0F4C40.5020207@panasas.com> <4C0FDD8C.2020704@zytor.com> <4C1653FF.3080108@panasas.com> <4C165BCF.4030507@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4C165BCF.4030507@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Borislav Petkov , =?UTF-8?B?VG9yYWxmIEbDtnJzdGVy?= , uml-devel , linux-kernel , Jeff Dike , Andrew Morton , "Rafael J. Wysocki" List-ID: On 06/14/2010 07:41 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 06/14/2010 09:08 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On 06/09/2010 09:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> On 06/09/2010 01:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>>> >>>> Peter, are you happy with this? >>>> Although we still don't know why UML cannot grok it, it does fix a >>>> regression in post-2.6.34. >>>> >>> >>> Yes, I'll push it. >>> >>> -hpa >> >> Peter hi. >> >> Why have we missed that patch from -rc3. This is so *not fun* to keep >> out-of-tree patches. Specially when working with lots of other people's >> trees. >> >> Please push it ASAP >> Boaz > > We made the decision of not pushing our queue for -rc3 because Linus > specifically wanted only critical fixes for -rc3. We will push it for > -rc4 for when Linus returns. > > Also, you may want to consider moderating your tone. > I did not meant any disrespect. I totally understand, I meant it as a a team member, that wants to help. I deeply regret if I offended you in any way, please forgive me. And, for My uml it is a very critical, "*can not* boot without", patch. I wish it could be pushed apart from any other patchset. Thanks Boaz > -hpa >