From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH] xencommons: modprobe xenfs if it not be loaded Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:45:15 +0100 Message-ID: <4C1F7AFB.4000801@goop.org> References: <4C1C744F.8030903@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C1C7B88.1000907@cn.fujitsu.com> <4C1F34D9.4000006@goop.org> <19487.29124.765359.790760@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19487.29124.765359.790760@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Keir Fraser , Yu Zhiguo List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/21/2010 03:05 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencommons: modprobe xenfs if it not be loaded"): > >> It should just be sufficient to explicitly mount /proc/xen, which will >> trigger a modprobe if necessary. >> > That sounds like a Nak of the patch to me. Unfortunately it has > already been applied (21641). > Is that tangled up in staging? J