From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: pvfb: Absolute vs relative mouse tracking mystery Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:59:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4C1F7E58.8030605@goop.org> References: <4BE49501.6000408@goop.org> <4BE86945.9050408@goop.org> <20100619154145.GM17817@reaktio.net> <4C1CE6DE.8000602@goop.org> <4C1F7DC4.3090706@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C1F7DC4.3090706@oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: John Haxby Cc: Xen-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/21/2010 03:57 PM, John Haxby wrote: > On 19/06/10 16:48, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> Yes, that should be fixed in current xen-unstable - it was a xenbus >> race-condition. What guest are you seeing it in? I've found that I >> still don't get absolute pointers in Centos guests. >> >> > > Do you know what the changeset it? This has been bugging me for a > while -- every now and again (just to taunt me) I get an absolute > pointer. It's in the qemu code, so you may need to explicitly make sure that has been updated: "cd tools/ioemu-remote; git pull". J