All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
	Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	oerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>,
	zhiteng.huang@intel.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/5] ara virt interface of perf to support kvm guest os statistics collection in guest os
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:12:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C207E63.5010504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1277172510.2096.585.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com>

On 06/22/2010 05:08 AM, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>
>> Something that is worrying is that we don't expose group information.
>> perf will multiplex the events for us, but there will be a loss in accuracy.
>>
>>      
>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
>>>    #include<asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
>>>    #endif
>>> @@ -753,6 +752,20 @@ struct perf_event {
>>>
>>>    	perf_overflow_handler_t		overflow_handler;
>>>
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * pointers used by kvm perf paravirt interface.
>>> +	 *
>>> +	 * 1) Used in host kernel and points to host_perf_shadow which
>>> +	 * has information about guest perf_event
>>> +	 */
>>> +	void				*host_perf_shadow;
>>>
>>>        
>> Can we have real types instead of void pointers?
>>      
> I just want perf generic codes have less dependency on KVM codes.
>    

One way to do that and retain type safety is to have

     struct perf_client {
           struct perf_client_ops *ops;
           ...
     }

The client (kvm) can do

    struct kvm_perf_client {
          struct perf_client pc;
          // kvm specific stuff
    };

the callbacks receive struct perf_client and use container_of to reach 
the kvm_perf_client that contains it.

>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * 2) Used in guest kernel and points to guest_perf_shadow which
>>> +	 * is used as a communication area with host kernel. Host kernel
>>> +	 * copies overflow data to it when an event overflows.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	void				*guest_perf_shadow;
>>>
>>>        
>> It's strange to see both guest and host parts in the same patch.
>> Splitting to separate patches will really help review.
>>      
> It's a little hard to split the patches if they change the same file. Perhaps
> I could add more statements before the patch when I send it out.
>    

With git, it's easy (once you're used to it):

   # go back one commit:
   git reset HEAD^
   # selectively add bits:
   git add -p
   # commit first patch
   git commit -s
   # selectively add bits:
   git add -p
   # commit second patch
   git commit -s


>>> @@ -1626,9 +1629,22 @@ void perf_event_task_tick(struct task_st
>>>    	if (ctx&&   ctx->nr_events&&   ctx->nr_events != ctx->nr_active)
>>>    		rotate = 1;
>>>
>>> -	perf_ctx_adjust_freq(&cpuctx->ctx);
>>> -	if (ctx)
>>> -		perf_ctx_adjust_freq(ctx);
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_PERF
>>> +	if (kvm_para_available()) {
>>> +		/*
>>> +		 * perf_ctx_adjust_freq causes lots of pmu->read which would
>>> +		 * trigger too many vmexit to host kernel. We disable it
>>> +		 * under para virt situation
>>> +		 */
>>> +		adjust_freq = 0;
>>> +	}
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>>        
>> Perhaps we can have a batch read interface which will read many counters
>> at once.
>>      
> It's a good idea. But that will touch many perf generic codes which causes it's hard
> to maintain or follow future changes.
>    

I'm talking about the guest/host interface.  So you have one vmexit and 
many host perf calls.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-22  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-21  9:31 [PATCH V2 2/5] ara virt interface of perf to support kvm guest os statistics collection in guest os Zhang, Yanmin
2010-06-21 12:00 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-22  2:08   ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-06-22  9:12     ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-06-22  9:25       ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-06-22  9:41         ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C207E63.5010504@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhiteng.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.