From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Slow vmalloc in 2.6.35-rc3
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:19:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C232324.7070305@redhat.com> (raw)
I see really slow vmalloc performance on 2.6.35-rc3:
# tracer: function_graph
#
# CPU DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
# | | | | | | |
3) 3.581 us | vfree();
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 523.880 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.702 us | vfree();
3) ! 529.960 us | }
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 564.200 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.429 us | vfree();
3) ! 568.080 us | }
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 578.560 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.697 us | vfree();
3) ! 584.791 us | }
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 559.657 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.566 us | vfree();
3) ! 575.948 us | }
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 536.558 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.553 us | vfree();
3) ! 542.243 us | }
3) | msr_io() {
3) ! 560.086 us | vmalloc();
3) 1.448 us | vfree();
3) ! 569.387 us | }
msr_io() is from arch/x86/kvm/x86.c, allocating at most 4K (yes it
should use kmalloc()). The memory is immediately vfree()ed. There are
96 entries in /proc/vmallocinfo, and the whole thing is single threaded
so there should be no contention.
Here's the perf report:
63.97% qemu
[kernel] [k] rb_next
|
--- rb_next
|
|--70.75%-- alloc_vmap_area
| __get_vm_area_node
| __vmalloc_node
| vmalloc
| |
| |--99.15%-- msr_io
| | kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl
| | kvm_vcpu_ioctl
| | vfs_ioctl
| | do_vfs_ioctl
| | sys_ioctl
| | system_call
| | __GI_ioctl
| | |
| | --100.00%--
0x1dfc4a8878e71362
| |
| --0.85%-- __kvm_set_memory_region
| kvm_set_memory_region
|
kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region
| kvm_vm_ioctl
| vfs_ioctl
| do_vfs_ioctl
| sys_ioctl
| system_call
| __GI_ioctl
|
--29.25%-- __get_vm_area_node
__vmalloc_node
vmalloc
|
|--98.89%-- msr_io
| kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl
| kvm_vcpu_ioctl
| vfs_ioctl
| do_vfs_ioctl
| sys_ioctl
| system_call
| __GI_ioctl
| |
| --100.00%--
0x1dfc4a8878e71362
It seems completely wrong - iterating 8 levels of a binary tree
shouldn't take half a millisecond.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-24 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-24 9:19 Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-06-24 15:14 ` Slow vmalloc in 2.6.35-rc3 Nick Piggin
2010-06-27 9:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-28 3:30 ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-28 3:30 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C232324.7070305@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.