All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Yaozu (Eddie) Dong" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Execute WBINVD to keep data consistency with assigned devices
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:54:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C246EBB.1020909@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1277452623-24046-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com>

Sheng Yang wrote:
> Some guest device driver may leverage the "Non-Snoop" I/O, and explicitly
> WBINVD or CLFLUSH to a RAM space. Since migration may occur before WBINVD or
> CLFLUSH, we need to maintain data consistency either by:
> 1: flushing cache (wbinvd) when the guest is scheduled out if there is no
> wbinvd exit, or
> 2: execute wbinvd on all dirty physical CPUs when guest wbinvd exits.
> 
> For wbinvd VMExit capable processors, we issue IPIs to all physical CPUs to
> do wbinvd, for we can't easily tell which physical CPUs are "dirty".

wbinvd is a heavy weapon in the hands of a guest. Even if it is limited
to pass-through scenarios, do we really need to bother all physical host
CPUs with potential multi-millisecond stalls? Think of VMs only running
on a subset of CPUs (e.g. to isolate latency sources). I would suggest
to track the physical CPU usage of VCPUs between two wbinvd requests and
only send the wbinvd IPI to that set.

Also, I think the code is still too much vmx-focused. Only the trapping
should be vendor specific, the rest generic.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-25  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-25  7:57 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Execute WBINVD to keep data consistency with assigned devices Sheng Yang
2010-06-25  8:54 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-06-25 10:20   ` Sheng Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C246EBB.1020909@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=sheng@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.