From: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][BUG-FIX] the problem of checksum checking in UDP protocol
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:49:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C287E40.40906@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1277530086.2481.15.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Eric Dumazet wrote, at 06/26/2010 01:28 PM:
>> (This patch is not complete, it's just for my idea.)
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
>> index 1dd1aff..47f7e86 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
>> @@ -723,6 +723,10 @@ int __udp6_lib_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct udp_table *udptable,
>> if (ulen < skb->len) {
>> if (pskb_trim_rcsum(skb, ulen))
>> goto short_packet;
>> +
>> + if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb))
>> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
>> +
>> saddr = &ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr;
>> daddr = &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr;
>> uh = udp_hdr(skb);
>>
>
> I really dont know if this fix is the right one.
>
> pskb_trim_rcsum() already contains a check. Should this check be changed
> to include yours ?
Oh..... I don't think so.
pskb_trim_rcsum() is also used when IPv4/IPv6 protocol receiving packets
and reassembling fragments. IP protocol does the right check and should
trust CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY flag that drivers set, So we no need to
change IP protocol.
If we add the skb_csum_unnecessary(skb) check into pskb_trim_rcsum() and
reset ip_summed with CHECKSUM_NONE, the checksum check that NIC hardward
has done is wasted.
Only for UDP protocol over IPv4/IPv6, and length parameter is lower than
skb->len, We reset ip_summed with CHECKSUM_NONE.
--
Best Regards
-----
Shan Wei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-28 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-17 9:09 [RFC][BUG-FIX] the problem of checksum checking in UDP protocol Shan Wei
2010-06-26 5:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-28 10:49 ` Shan Wei [this message]
2010-06-28 20:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-29 6:39 ` Shan Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C287E40.40906@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.