From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 of 3] xencommons: Make init script more
	verbose
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:30:14 +0100
Message-ID: <4C28CE16.2050909@eu.citrix.com>
References: <patchbomb.1277729923@gdunlap-desktop>	<9781a01f6ccbed092d92.1277729925@gdunlap-desktop>
	<19496.51529.780811.487267@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <19496.51529.780811.487267@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 28/06/10 17:09, Ian Jackson wrote:
> This would be great except that it doesn't apply to xen-unstable
> because it depends on your previous patch ...

That wasn't the bit of the patch series I expected be controversial. :-) 
  I'll submit a new patch when I put the timeout in the wait loop.

  -George