diff for duplicates of <4C29DCC1.2060707@openwrt.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 67dfe8e..a292000 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ On 2010-06-29 8:08 AM, Benoit Papillault wrote: -> Le 29/06/2010 00:55, Felix Fietkau a ?crit : ->> On 2010-06-29 12:31 AM, Bj?rn Smedman wrote: +> Le 29/06/2010 00:55, Felix Fietkau a écrit : +>> On 2010-06-29 12:31 AM, Björn Smedman wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm getting weird values from the debugfs file ieee80211/phy0/tsf: the @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ On 2010-06-29 8:08 AM, Benoit Papillault wrote: > lower bits of rstamp were used when being extended (but rstamp is 32 > bits in fact). If so, it has been fixed by Felix in the following commit : Nope, different issue. The TSF extending applies only to rx timestamps, -however Bj?rn has been observing weird TSF values from the hw register. +however Björn has been observing weird TSF values from the hw register. The Rx TSF timestamp is pretty much irrelevant in AP mode. - Felix diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 00fd194..0eefbab 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,14 +2,17 @@ "ref\04C29284C.5050707@openwrt.org\0" "ref\04C298DD2.8010704@free.fr\0" "From\0Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>\0" - "Subject\0[ath9k-devel] ath9k: ap tsf seems random and only uses lower 24\tbits or so\0" + "Subject\0Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: ap tsf seems random and only uses lower 24\tbits or so\0" "Date\0Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:45:05 +0200\0" - "To\0ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org\0" + "To\0Benoit Papillault <benoit.papillault@free.fr>\0" + "Cc\0Bj\303\266rn Smedman <bjorn.smedman@venatech.se>" + ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org + " linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 2010-06-29 8:08 AM, Benoit Papillault wrote:\n" - "> Le 29/06/2010 00:55, Felix Fietkau a ?crit :\n" - ">> On 2010-06-29 12:31 AM, Bj?rn Smedman wrote:\n" + "> Le 29/06/2010 00:55, Felix Fietkau a \303\251crit :\n" + ">> On 2010-06-29 12:31 AM, Bj\303\266rn Smedman wrote:\n" ">>> Hi all,\n" ">>>\n" ">>> I'm getting weird values from the debugfs file ieee80211/phy0/tsf: the\n" @@ -33,9 +36,9 @@ "> lower bits of rstamp were used when being extended (but rstamp is 32 \n" "> bits in fact). If so, it has been fixed by Felix in the following commit :\n" "Nope, different issue. The TSF extending applies only to rx timestamps,\n" - "however Bj?rn has been observing weird TSF values from the hw register.\n" + "however Bj\303\266rn has been observing weird TSF values from the hw register.\n" "The Rx TSF timestamp is pretty much irrelevant in AP mode.\n" "\n" - Felix -dc7975d956d9ee22881f1c1e02eaac0abb4ad7f4b8be0a2f71249181e653f674 +692db30a051b6fabf832cdf5912a8508f9cee512fed6edb5179eda9cb9b9b9fb
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.