All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <4C2A6463.6060103@free.fr>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index dca1208..148e436 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-Le 29/06/2010 13:45, Felix Fietkau a ?crit :
+Le 29/06/2010 13:45, Felix Fietkau a écrit :
 > On 2010-06-29 8:08 AM, Benoit Papillault wrote:
->> Le 29/06/2010 00:55, Felix Fietkau a ?crit :
->>> On 2010-06-29 12:31 AM, Bj?rn Smedman wrote:
+>> Le 29/06/2010 00:55, Felix Fietkau a écrit :
+>>> On 2010-06-29 12:31 AM, Björn Smedman wrote:
 >>>> Hi all,
 >>>>
 >>>> I'm getting weird values from the debugfs file ieee80211/phy0/tsf: the
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Le 29/06/2010 13:45, Felix Fietkau a ?crit :
 >> lower bits of rstamp were used when being extended (but rstamp is 32
 >> bits in fact). If so, it has been fixed by Felix in the following commit :
 > Nope, different issue. The TSF extending applies only to rx timestamps,
-> however Bj?rn has been observing weird TSF values from the hw register.
+> however Björn has been observing weird TSF values from the hw register.
 > The Rx TSF timestamp is pretty much irrelevant in AP mode.
 >
 > - Felix
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index f067885..811e735 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,15 +3,18 @@
  "ref\04C298DD2.8010704@free.fr\0"
  "ref\04C29DCC1.2060707@openwrt.org\0"
  "From\0Benoit Papillault <benoit.papillault@free.fr>\0"
- "Subject\0[ath9k-devel] ath9k: ap tsf seems random and only uses lower 24\tbits or so\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: ap tsf seems random and only uses lower 24\tbits or so\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:23:47 +0200\0"
- "To\0ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org\0"
+ "To\0Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>\0"
+ "Cc\0Bj\303\266rn Smedman <bjorn.smedman@venatech.se>"
+  ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
+ " linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "Le 29/06/2010 13:45, Felix Fietkau a ?crit :\n"
+ "Le 29/06/2010 13:45, Felix Fietkau a \303\251crit :\n"
  "> On 2010-06-29 8:08 AM, Benoit Papillault wrote:\n"
- ">> Le 29/06/2010 00:55, Felix Fietkau a ?crit :\n"
- ">>> On 2010-06-29 12:31 AM, Bj?rn Smedman wrote:\n"
+ ">> Le 29/06/2010 00:55, Felix Fietkau a \303\251crit :\n"
+ ">>> On 2010-06-29 12:31 AM, Bj\303\266rn Smedman wrote:\n"
  ">>>> Hi all,\n"
  ">>>>\n"
  ">>>> I'm getting weird values from the debugfs file ieee80211/phy0/tsf: the\n"
@@ -35,7 +38,7 @@
  ">> lower bits of rstamp were used when being extended (but rstamp is 32\n"
  ">> bits in fact). If so, it has been fixed by Felix in the following commit :\n"
  "> Nope, different issue. The TSF extending applies only to rx timestamps,\n"
- "> however Bj?rn has been observing weird TSF values from the hw register.\n"
+ "> however Bj\303\266rn has been observing weird TSF values from the hw register.\n"
  "> The Rx TSF timestamp is pretty much irrelevant in AP mode.\n"
  ">\n"
  "> - Felix\n"
@@ -47,4 +50,4 @@
  "Regards,\n"
  Benoit
 
-bac607676ca50e304d41cd48f2a9630d1c8f9ce21f0beae4f3938e727ed0f14c
+481e05540fce4ebb99a50321701928b0de9f4327da9337f778be4f9f4af75fd5

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.