From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(fetch)() functions
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:05:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C2AFAAC.8040308@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2AF9FA.9020601@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cleanup this function that we are already get the direct sp's access
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index f28f09d..3350c02 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -306,12 +306,18 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
gfn_t table_gfn;
int r;
int level;
+ bool dirty = is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[gw->level - 1]);
+ unsigned direct_access;
pt_element_t curr_pte;
struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
if (!is_present_gpte(gw->ptes[gw->level - 1]))
return NULL;
+ direct_access = gw->pt_access & gw->pte_access;
+ if (!dirty)
+ direct_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
+
for_each_shadow_entry(vcpu, addr, iterator) {
level = iterator.level;
sptep = iterator.sptep;
@@ -319,15 +325,13 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
mmu_set_spte(vcpu, sptep, access,
gw->pte_access & access,
user_fault, write_fault,
- is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[gw->level-1]),
- ptwrite, level,
+ dirty, ptwrite, level,
gw->gfn, pfn, false, true);
break;
}
if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && !is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
- unsigned direct_access;
if (level != gw->level)
continue;
@@ -339,10 +343,6 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
* so we should update the spte at this point to get
* a new sp with the correct access.
*/
- direct_access = gw->pt_access & gw->pte_access;
- if (!is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[gw->level - 1]))
- direct_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
-
child = page_header(*sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
if (child->role.access == direct_access)
continue;
@@ -359,11 +359,8 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
}
if (level <= gw->level) {
- int delta = level - gw->level + 1;
direct = 1;
- if (!is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[level - delta]))
- access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
- access &= gw->pte_access;
+ access = direct_access;
/*
* It is a large guest pages backed by small host pages,
--
1.6.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-30 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 8:02 [PATCH v3 1/11] KVM: MMU: fix writable sync sp mapping Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/11] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/11] KVM: MMU: fix direct sp's access corruptted Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 19:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-01 0:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30 8:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/11] KVM: MMU: fix forgot to flush all vcpu's tlb Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:05 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-07-01 12:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(fetch)() functions Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30 8:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/11] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:06 ` [PATCH v3 7/11] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_hva_many() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 8/11] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache() Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:08 ` [PATCH v3 9/11] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 20:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-01 1:11 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-01 12:11 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-01 12:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 12:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-30 8:08 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-06-30 8:09 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C2AFAAC.8040308@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.