From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gandharva.secretlabs.de ([78.46.147.237]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTxHC-0002fj-KQ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:24:31 +0200 Received: from [123.192.240.117] (unknown [123.192.240.117]) by gandharva.secretlabs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A29C01B10C09 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C2B446A.5040301@freyther.de> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:19:38 +0800 From: Holger Freyther User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100624 Fedora/3.1-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4C0F9119.3000909@freyther.de> <4C2B1BC4.2030808@freyther.de> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.46.147.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: holger+oe@freyther.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: TSC Meetings for the meeting of June X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:24:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/30/2010 07:05 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > What about tackling the items from the previous month first before going > off on this cosmetic change that wasn't even discussed in the community > first before the TSC jumped the gun on it? Well, what do you want to say with was not discussed? We would not have picked up the topic when it was not discussed in the community as we are not making up topics. And rest assured personally for a non native english speaker master, foobar, blabla has about the same semantic for a branch name (I get used to any of those), for the native ones this was a pretty big issue... In regard to the TSC, what mode of operation do you propose? We freeze the tree until all items are implemented in the order they are proposed? We find people driving a topic?