From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Questions about virtual managed interfaces.
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:39:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C2C2A05.4020208@candelatech.com> (raw)
I'm trying to understand the features and limitations of the ath9k
virtual phy and virtual station support. I'm using the 2.6.34 kernel.
First, I was able to create new virtual phys with the
echo add > /debug/ath9k/phy1/wiphy
logic.
That seems to work OK, and a new wlanX interface is created.
The first potential problem I see is that the wlanX interfaces
have the same MAC. A previous post to this list made it appear
that they would be XORd with phy-id or similar to get a unique
MAC?
It does appear that I can set the MAC address using 'ip link set ...', but I'm
not sure if that is the right approach.
I also tried adding new managed interfaces using
iw phy phy1 interface add wlan1-1 type managed
This also seems to work in as far as a new interface is created.
Now, I am curious about configuring these things.
* If I have two managed wlans on the same phy, I assume they must
both be on the same channel? Is there any support in the driver
to make sure that once one interface is associated on a particular
channel that another interface cannot start scanning on different channels
(and thus disrupt the first one)?
In some previous hackings of virtual station interfaces on ath5k, we
had all sorts of issues getting a bunch of interfaces associated
when using wpa-supplicant because one would start scanning and that would
dis-associate the others..over and over.
* If I want, say, 128 virtual station interfaces, does it make sense to try
to use 128 virtual phys, or should I aim at multiple stations per phy?
If anyone has tested the upper limits of how many virtual phys and/or
stations can be supported, I'm interested to know!
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next reply other threads:[~2010-07-01 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-01 5:39 Ben Greear [this message]
2010-07-01 13:14 ` [ath9k-devel] Questions about virtual managed interfaces Rodolphe Marques
2010-07-05 19:14 ` Ben Greear
2010-07-06 12:36 ` Rodolphe Marques
2010-07-06 16:20 ` Ben Greear
2010-07-01 13:17 ` pat-lkml
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C2C2A05.4020208@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.