From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gandharva.secretlabs.de ([78.46.147.237]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUIwI-0002nV-S2 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:32:24 +0200 Received: from [123.192.240.117] (unknown [123.192.240.117]) by gandharva.secretlabs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 754581B10C09 for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C2C89B7.6040709@freyther.de> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:27:35 +0800 From: Holger Freyther User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100624 Fedora/3.1-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4C2C5912.80308@jak.nl> In-Reply-To: <4C2C5912.80308@jak.nl> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.46.147.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: holger+oe@freyther.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: meta-toolchain-qte produces toolchain with missing Qt include dirs X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:32:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/01/2010 05:00 PM, Arjan wrote: > I'm trying to build the sdk as described in de OE manual. > [http://docs.openembedded.org/usermanual/usermanual.html#id501110] > I did not modify the qt4-embedded.inc or qt4.inc. > The final sdk archive misses almost all the includes from de Qt > framework (it only has qtopia/QtCore and qtopia/phonon) . But it does > include the libs and binaries. > > Is this expected behaviour or am I doing something wrong? Well, if the example in the manual to build an application doesn't work, then it is obviously broken...