From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:12:06 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] s3c-fb: Separate S5PC100 and S5PV210 framebuffer Message-Id: <4C2DC986.7040705@simtec.co.uk> List-Id: References: <1277712538-23188-1-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com> <1277712538-23188-4-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <1277712538-23188-4-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 28/06/10 09:08, Pawel Osciak wrote: > S5PC100 and S5PV210 framebuffer devices differ slightly in terms of > available registers and their driver data structures have to be separate. Would have been nice to note which ones changes, otherwise ok. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] s3c-fb: Separate S5PC100 and S5PV210 framebuffer driver data structures Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:12:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4C2DC986.7040705@simtec.co.uk> References: <1277712538-23188-1-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com> <1277712538-23188-4-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hull.simtec.co.uk ([78.105.113.97]:48826 "EHLO preston.local.simtec.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752142Ab0GBLMJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 07:12:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1277712538-23188-4-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Pawel Osciak Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, ben-linux@fluff.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com On 28/06/10 09:08, Pawel Osciak wrote: > S5PC100 and S5PV210 framebuffer devices differ slightly in terms of > available registers and their driver data structures have to be separate. Would have been nice to note which ones changes, otherwise ok. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ben@simtec.co.uk (Ben Dooks) Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:12:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 03/12] s3c-fb: Separate S5PC100 and S5PV210 framebuffer driver data structures In-Reply-To: <1277712538-23188-4-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com> References: <1277712538-23188-1-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com> <1277712538-23188-4-git-send-email-p.osciak@samsung.com> Message-ID: <4C2DC986.7040705@simtec.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 28/06/10 09:08, Pawel Osciak wrote: > S5PC100 and S5PV210 framebuffer devices differ slightly in terms of > available registers and their driver data structures have to be separate. Would have been nice to note which ones changes, otherwise ok.