From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:08:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C2F2835.5060508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C2F117C.2000006@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 07/03/2010 01:31 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>> See how the pte is reread inside fetch with mmu_lock held.
>>
>>
> It looks like something is broken in 'fetch' functions, this patch will
> fix it.
>
> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: MMU: fix last level broken in FNAME(fetch)
>
> We read the guest level out of 'mmu_lock', sometimes, the host mapping is
> confusion. Consider this case:
>
> VCPU0: VCPU1
>
> Read guest mapping, assume the mapping is:
> GLV3 -> GLV2 -> GLV1 -> GFNA,
> And in the host, the corresponding mapping is
> HLV3 -> HLV2 -> HLV1(P=0)
>
> Write GLV1 and cause the
> mapping point to GFNB
> (May occur in pte_write or
> invlpg path)
>
> Mapping GLV1 to GFNA
>
> This issue only occurs in the last indirect mapping, since if the middle
> mapping is changed, the mapping will be zapped, then it will be detected
> in the FNAME(fetch) path, but when it map the last level, it not checked.
>
> Fixed by also check the last level.
>
>
I don't really see what is fixed. We already check the gpte. What's
special about the new scenario?
> @@ -322,6 +334,12 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
> level = iterator.level;
> sptep = iterator.sptep;
> if (iterator.level == hlevel) {
> + if (check&& level == gw->level&&
> + !FNAME(check_level_mapping)(vcpu, gw, hlevel)) {
> + kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> + break;
> + }
> +
>
Now we check here...
> mmu_set_spte(vcpu, sptep, access,
> gw->pte_access& access,
> user_fault, write_fault,
> @@ -376,10 +394,10 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
> sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, table_gfn, addr, level-1,
> direct, access, sptep);
> if (!direct) {
> - r = kvm_read_guest_atomic(vcpu->kvm,
> - gw->pte_gpa[level - 2],
> - &curr_pte, sizeof(curr_pte));
> - if (r || curr_pte != gw->ptes[level - 2]) {
> + if (hlevel == level - 1)
> + check = false;
> +
> + if (!FNAME(check_level_mapping)(vcpu, gw, level - 1)) {
>
... and here? Why?
(looking at the code, we have a call to kvm_host_page_size() on every
page fault, that takes mmap_sem... that's got to impact scaling)
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-03 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-01 13:53 [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_page_many_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache() Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-02 16:54 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-03 8:08 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 12:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-06 0:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-01 13:55 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between walk and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-02 17:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-03 10:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-03 12:08 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-07-03 12:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-03 12:26 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 12:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-03 12:44 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 12:49 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 13:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-04 14:30 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 2:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 8:23 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 8:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 9:05 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 9:09 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-05 9:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-05 9:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-03 12:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-04 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-03 11:48 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-01 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-02 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-03 3:13 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C2F2835.5060508@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.