Re: [PATCH v2]ata:ahci.c Fix warning: comparison between 'enum <anonymous>' and 'enum <anonymous>'

["Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>]

On 07/03/2010 02:57 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 06/30/2010 09:21 AM, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>>> What does the extra warning buy us?  There are several places which
>>> use anonymous enums for constants and I can't see what the benefit of
>>> this warning would be.
>>
>> I don't think it buys us anything..think it's just saying "hey
>> you have two #defines with the same value" or something in that
>> area(if Im reading the warning correctly) funny thing is, is
>> gcc should of done the same with the original patch that I
>> sent, as well as the second..  (but could be wrong).
>
> Okay, just tested and it's warning that the code is comparing two
> enums which are from two different enum blocks.  I'm kind of
> doubtful about its usefulness but then again I don't think there
> will be many occassions of this to be problematic either.  For
> now, can you please submit a patch to cast just ATA_MAX_QUEUE
> to (int) before comparing and short comment explanining why it's
> necessary?
>
> Thanks.
>


o.k. so it's what you where asking..

cheers,

Justin P. Mattock