From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mike@compulab.co.il (Mike Rapoport) Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:31:27 +0300 Subject: Some benchmarks on ARM In-Reply-To: <20100705132339.GY20855@pengutronix.de> References: <20100702180257.GA8767@pengutronix.de> <4C31D861.607@gmail.com> <20100705132339.GY20855@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <4C31DEAF.6020205@compulab.co.il> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Robert Schwebel wrote: > Maurus, > > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 03:04:33PM +0200, Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: >> Some quick tests of lmbench on a Sheevaplug: > > Thanks a lot - we'll update the document soon, wiht the exact command > lines included. > >> I'm not sure if I'm doing this right, but it looks like the Sheevaplug >> beats all ARM chips (except on FP) on the tests done at [1]. Looks >> like these tests heavily depend on the clock frequency. > > If anyone has an idea for better benchmarks, I'd be very interested. We > have been searching for benchmarks which: > > - can be easily cross compiled to all involved platforms > - show the different aspects of the systems Native kernel build? ;-) > rsc -- Sincerely yours, Mike.