Re: blktap2 bug:Assertion 'list_empty(&vreq->next)' failed

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>]

On 07/05/2010 02:25 PM, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 08:55 -0400, tsk wrote:
>   
>> Hi, will the patches be added to Xen-4.1？
>>     
> About to prepare the next bunch of patches for xen.git.
>
> Jeremy, is it okay to pull some of the changes made for 2.6.3x into the
> xen/dom0/backend/blktap2 topic branch before moving on?
>
> I'm mainly talking about this one:
>
> >From ab77527f9a63a5c657c6d6a50e70a66adceaa3a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:22:09 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] xen/blktap2: make compile
>
> and a couple related deltas which came later.
>
> Except moving forward to newer blk queue interfaces, they don't make
> much of a functional difference.
>
> Would simplify merging quite a bit.
>   

Which kernel version has these interface updates?  Do they predate the
version the blktap2 branch is rooted on, or do the come later?  If
they're later, then merge the mainline kernel (ideally a tagged release
like v2.6.3[12]) into the blktap2 one and cherrypick the "make compile"
changes on top of the merge (and if they're already there, then just
cherrypick).

    J