All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Joanna Rutkowska <joanna@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Re: DomU lockups after resume from S3 on Core i5 processors
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:17:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C3267FB.3070202@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C326241.2030503@invisiblethingslab.com>

On 07/05/2010 03:52 PM, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
> On 07/06/10 00:43, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>   
>> On 07/05/2010 03:07 PM, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
>>     
>>> On 07/05/10 23:28, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> On 07/05/10 12:38, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> I'm experiencing very reproducible DomU lockups that occur after I
>>>>> resume the system from an S3 sleep. Strangely this seem to happen only
>>>>> on my Core i5 systems (tested on two different machines), but not on
>>>>> older Core 2 Duo systems.
>>>>>
>>>>> Usually this causes the apps (e.g. Firefox) running in DomUs to become
>>>>> unresponsive, but sometimes I see that some very limited functionality
>>>>> of the app is still available (e.g. I can open/close Tabs in Firefox,
>>>>> but cannot do much anything more). Also, when I log in to the DomU via
>>>>> xm console, I usually can see the login prompt, can enter the username,
>>>>> but then the console hangs.
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried to attach to such a hanged DomU using gdbserver-xen, but when I
>>>>> subsequently try to attach to the server from gdb (via the target
>>>>> 127.0.0.1:9999 command), my gdb segfaults (how funny!).
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm running Xen 3.4.3, and fairly recent pvops0 kernel in DomU. In Dom0
>>>>> I run 2.6.34-xenlinux kernel (opensuse patches), but I doubt it is
>>>>> relevant in any way.
>>>>>
>>>>> This seems like a scheduling problem, and, because it seems to affect
>>>>> Core i5 processors, but not Core 2 Duos, it might have something to do
>>>>> with Hyperthreading perhaps?
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Ok, finally got the gdbsever working. This is the backtrace I get when
>>>> attaching to a lockedup DomU after resume:
>>>>
>>>> #0  0xffffffff810093aa in ?? ()
>>>> #1  0xffffffff8168be18 in ?? ()
>>>> #2  0xffff880003a21600 in ?? ()
>>>> #3  0xffffffff8100ee63 in HYPERVISOR_sched_op ()
>>>>     at
>>>> /usr/src/debug/kernel-2.6.32/linux-2.6.32.x86_64/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:292
>>>> #4  xen_safe_halt () at arch/x86/xen/irq.c:104
>>>> #5  0xffffffff8100c33e in raw_safe_halt () at
>>>> /usr/src/debug/kernel-2.6.32/linux-2.6.32.x86_64/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:110
>>>> #6  xen_idle () at arch/x86/xen/setup.c:193
>>>> #7  0xffffffff81011cdd in cpu_idle () at arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:143
>>>> #8  0xffffffff8144b997 in rest_init () at init/main.c:445
>>>> #9  0xffffffff81824ddc in start_kernel () at init/main.c:695
>>>> #10 0xffffffff818242c1 in x86_64_start_reservations
>>>> (real_mode_data=<value optimized out>) at arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:123
>>>> #11 0xffffffff81828160 in xen_start_kernel () at
>>>> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:1300
>>>> #12 0xffffffff838f3000 in ?? ()
>>>> #13 0xffffffff838f4000 in ?? ()
>>>> #14 0xffffffff838f5000 in ?? ()
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> ... and when I disabled Hyperthreading in BIOS, the problem seems to
>>> gone. Obviously this is not a desired solution...
>>>   
>>>       
>> HT has historically been very good at flushing out race conditions which
>> would normally be tricky to hit on SMP systems.  I assume your domain is
>> single CPU?
>>     
> Actually no. It used to be indeed, but then I thought it might be the
> issue and assigned 2 vcpus to it, but it still they were locking up.
>   

Does the other cpu have the same backtrace into idle?

>> Do you know what's going on it in that it might be waiting
>> for?
>>     
> No idea. I might be guessing that it would be different kernel
> subsystems each time -- e.g. when I'm lucky and when the apps got only
> "partially" locked up, I can e.g. open new tabs in Google Chrome, I can
> see some thumbnails of my popular websites, but without their contents.
> This would suggest the networking subsystem is dead, but at the same
> time Chrome is apparently communicating fine with the X server in the
> DomU (and which in turn talks fine with Dom0 over Xen shared
> memory/evtchanl).
>
> I experienced the above behavior also when had only one VCPU er DomU.
>   

I've seen similar things with just normal domain save/restore, where the
timer interrupt seems to be failing.  Can you ssh into the domain?  I
found that I couldn't do an interactive ssh (hung at the prompt), but a
non-interactive command would work, so I could cat /proc/interrupts.

This was on my non-HT i7 box, and it affected both pvops domUs, and
CentOS 5 ones.

>>  Is it not longer getting timer events or something?  Does the Xen
>> 'q' debug-key make it do anything?
>>     
> Ah, that's some secret option I've never heard of... Is in the gdb when
> using with gdbserver-xen?
>   

No, on the xen console: type ^A^A^A to switch input to Xen, then press q
(h gets a list of other magic keys).  ^A^A^A switches the console back
to dom0.  You can also trigger it with "xm debug-key q" and look at "xm
dmesg" to see the results if you can't get to the Xen console.

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-05 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-05 10:38 DomU lockups after resume from S3 on Core i5 processors Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 21:28 ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 22:07   ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 22:43     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-07-05 22:52       ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-05 23:17         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2010-07-06  8:41           ` Jan Beulich
2010-07-06  8:59             ` Joanna Rutkowska
2010-07-06  9:57               ` Jan Beulich
2010-07-08 14:04     ` Joanna Rutkowska

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C3267FB.3070202@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=joanna@invisiblethingslab.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.