From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mike@compulab.co.il (Mike Rapoport)
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:36:33 +0300
Subject: Some benchmarks on ARM
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1007051009330.6020@xanadu.home>
References: <20100702180257.GA8767@pengutronix.de>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1007030136510.32016@xanadu.home>
	<4C31D861.607@gmail.com> <20100705132339.GY20855@pengutronix.de>
	<4C31DEAF.6020205@compulab.co.il>
	<20100705134252.GA20855@pengutronix.de>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1007051009330.6020@xanadu.home>
Message-ID: <4C32C0E1.90507@compulab.co.il>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 04:31:27PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> Native kernel build? ;-)
>> Hmm, I don't have a native compiler for all platforms yet.
> 
> Kernel compile is a really bad test in this context anyway, unless you 
> compile the exact same kernel target using the same config with the SAME 
> gcc version on all test machines, and using the same filesystem type and 
> medium.

It's quite possible with, say, Debian on USB disk...

> It is best to keep kernel compilation test for validation of 
> improvements to a single system.
> 
> 
> Nicolas


-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.