From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: cpu softplug kernel hang
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:52:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C361E6C.2080107@redhat.com> (raw)
The panic below is from an 2.6.32-based kernel, however, AFAICT the same
issue exists with the latest 2.6.35-rc3+ kernel.
I have diagnosed the issue as being identical to the issue that I fixed
with the Intel rngd
driver sometime ago:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117275119001289&w=2
When doing the following,
while true; do
for i in `seq 12 23`; do echo 0 >
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/online; done
sleep 5
for i in `seq 12 23`; do echo 1 >
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/online; done
sleep 5
done
I see (with the nmi_watchdog enabled)
BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU11, ip ffffffff81029e72, registers:
CPU 11
Modules linked in: nfs lockd fscache nfs_acl auth_rpcgss autofs4 sunrpc
cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table ipv6 dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log
uinput sg serio_raw i2c_i801 iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support ioatdma i7core_edac
edac_core shpchp igb dca ext4 mbcache jbd2 sr_mod cdrom sd_mod crc_t10dif ahci
pata_acpi ata_generic pata_jmicron radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit
i2c_core dm_mod [last unloaded: microcode]
Modules linked in: nfs lockd fscache nfs_acl auth_rpcgss autofs4 sunrpc
cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table ipv6 dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log
uinput sg serio_raw i2c_i801 iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support ioatdma i7core_edac
edac_core shpchp igb dca ext4 mbcache jbd2 sr_mod cdrom sd_mod crc_t10dif ahci
pata_acpi ata_generic pata_jmicron radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit
i2c_core dm_mod [last unloaded: microcode]
Pid: 704, comm: kexec Not tainted 2.6.32 #1 X8DTN
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81029e72>] [<ffffffff81029e72>] ipi_handler+0x32/0xa0
RSP: 0000:ffff8801474a3f58 EFLAGS: 00000046
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880337393ea8 RCX: ffff88013ae41580
RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff880337393ea8
RBP: ffff8801474a3f68 R08: 0000000061c941a6 R09: 00000000578070b9
R10: 0000000080507210 R11: 0000000025410601 R12: 0000000000000086
R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: ffffffff817491d0 R15: 0000000090793245
FS: 00007fefd5f3d700(0000) GS:ffff8801474a0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 000000000040d000 CR3: 0000000316a8e000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process kexec (pid: 704, threadinfo ffff880314caa000, task ffff880335a0b500)
Stack:
ffff880147571f40 000000000000000b ffff8801474a3f98 ffffffff810a6d28
<0> 00000000aa149910 00000000f21570f0 000000000008b495 00000000521ebd53
<0> ffff8801474a3fa8 ffffffff8102ea57 ffff880314cabf80 ffffffff81013e53
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
[<ffffffff810a6d28>] generic_smp_call_function_interrupt+0x78/0x130
[<ffffffff8102ea57>] smp_call_function_interrupt+0x27/0x40
[<ffffffff81013e53>] call_function_interrupt+0x13/0x20
<EOI>
Code: 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 fb 9c 58 0f 1f 44 00 00 49 89 c4 fa 66 0f 1f 44 00
00 f0 ff 0f 8b 47 04 85 c0 75 0f 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 90 <8b> 43 04 85 c0 74 f7
8b 7b 18 83 ff ff 74 47 48 8b 05 08 25 a1
Since this is a panic, I get traces from all other cpus.
CPU 14 is in _write_lock_irq
CPU 2 is in _read_lock
CPU 6 has called smp_call_function() with the ipi_handler to sync mtrr's on
the new cpu
The problem is that ipi_handler does this:
static void ipi_handler(void *info)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct set_mtrr_data *data = info;
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
atomic_dec(&data->count); << global value that each processor entering
ipi_handler decrements
while (!atomic_read(&data->gate)) << 1 when data->count != 0
cpu_relax();
So what happens is that CPU 2 is in _read_lock and has acquired a lock. CPU 14
is waiting for the release of that lock with IRQs *off*.
CPU 6 launches smp_call_function, and CPU 2 answers and runs the ipi_handler()
and waits (as do all other processors).
CPU 14, however, does not see the IPI because it is waiting with interrupts off
for the lock that CPU 2 is holding.
Boom. Deadlock.
I'm planning on fixing this by rewriting this code and using stop_machine_run()
to synchronize the cpus instead of doing it in the ipi_handler.
Unless, of course, someone has a better suggestion.
P.
next reply other threads:[~2010-07-08 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-08 18:52 Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2010-07-08 19:47 ` cpu softplug kernel hang Prarit Bhargava
2010-07-08 22:17 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-07-08 23:05 ` Prarit Bhargava
2010-07-13 7:09 ` Luming Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C361E6C.2080107@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.