wm8776_dai vs. cs4270_dai

[Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>]

Mark,

In wm8776.c, the DAI structure is defined as an array of two elements, one
for playback and one for capture:

struct snd_soc_dai_driver wm8776_dai[] = {
	{
		.name = "WM8776 Playback",
		.playback = {
			.stream_name = "Playback",
			.channels_min = 2,
			.channels_max = 2,
			.rates = WM8776_RATES,
			.formats = WM8776_FORMATS,
		},
		.ops = &wm8776_dac_ops,
	},
	{
		.name = "WM8776 Capture",
		.capture = {
			.stream_name = "Capture",
			.channels_min = 2,
			.channels_max = 2,
			.rates = WM8776_RATES,
			.formats = WM8776_FORMATS,
		},
		.ops = &wm8776_adc_ops,
	},
};

In my CS4270 driver, I have these combined into one structure:

struct snd_soc_dai_driver cs4270_dai = {
	.name = "cs4270",
	.playback = {
		.stream_name = "Playback",
		.channels_min = 1,
		.channels_max = 2,
		.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_CONTINUOUS,
		.rate_min = 4000,
		.rate_max = 216000,
		.formats = CS4270_FORMATS,
	},
	.capture = {
		.stream_name = "Capture",
		.channels_min = 1,
		.channels_max = 2,
		.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_CONTINUOUS,
		.rate_min = 4000,
		.rate_max = 216000,
		.formats = CS4270_FORMATS,
	},
	.ops = &cs4270_dai_ops,
};

Should the CS4270 driver be changed to use two structures?