From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Thomas Graves <tgraves@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Xenalyze?
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:04:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C37023D.8010201@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C85BB686.56845%tgraves@yahoo-inc.com>
OK, I unified all of the p->current checks, so all of them only issue a
warning and skip that record. Try it now.
On my to-do list is to add a lamport clock to the runstate change trace
records. Hopefully that will solve the intractable TSC drift problems
once and for all.
-George
On 08/07/10 23:08, Thomas Graves wrote:
> Thanks for the updates. It ran a lot longer then before but it still
> ended up failing. I’ll try truncating the file and a few other things.
> Let me know if you have any other ideas.
>
>
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate blocked.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate blocked, d1402v0 runstate runnable.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate blocked, d1402v0 runstate runnable.
> Possible tsc skew.
> runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate running.
> Possible tsc skew.
> Not updating.
> FATAL: p->current null
> ] 20f101(20:f:101) 3 [ 802061ea ffffffff f ]
>
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 7/8/10 11:36 AM, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>
> I had a work-around for the problem in a local patch-queue somewhere.
> I've pushed it (along with a bunch of local stuff I had lying around
> ) -- do a pull and let me know if it works better.
>
> -George
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Thomas Graves
> <tgraves@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> >
> > -bash-3.2$ hg id
> > 503e0902a86a+ tip
> > -bash-3.2$ hg parents
> > changeset: 49:503e0902a86a
> > tag: tip
> > user: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> > date: Tue Jun 22 17:11:51 2010 +0100
> > summary: More xenalyze type fixes
> >
> > I’m using a clone of http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xenalyze.hg
> and then
> > patched with the patch -p1 < back-patches/3.4.diff and make on
> rhel5.4.
> >
> > Let me know if you
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > On 7/8/10 9:24 AM, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The file length itself probably isn't that important, but rather the
> > fact that longer trace files increase the opportunity for certain
> > kinds of probabilistic problematic events to occur.
> >
> > The problem here looks like a problem with TSC skew -- xenalyze is
> > having trouble figuring out how to process the records in the right
> > order because of drift in the TSC value across cores (that's what the
> > "Possible tsc skew" messages are about), and end up breaking an
> > assumption because it's failing (hence the "FATAL: p->current = NULL"
> > message) .
> >
> > Can you give me the cs of the tip of your hg tree? I'll take a look
> > and see if I have a local fix.
> >
> > -George
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Thomas Graves
> <tgraves@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm new to using xentrace and xenalyze and I am having problems
> running
> > > xenalyze on a large trace file. It is always giving me a fatal
> error. If I
> > > run it on like a 30 second trace it seems to work fine.
> > >
> > > Is this a known issue or am I possibly doing something wrong? Do you
> > > think
> > > it would work if I truncate the file or would it be missing stuff
> xenalyze
> > > expects? If there is no way to truncate it perhaps I'll see if I can
> > > modify it to only show me certain time frame - I haven't looked
> at the
> > > code
> > > yet so I guess I'll have to see if that is possible.
> > >
> > > I'm using xen3.4.3 with rhel5.4 dom0 running a rhel5.4 vm.
> > >
> > > I'm trying to debug a vm hang at boot which sporadically occurs
> so I just
> > > have trace running while I do a bunch of creates and deletes so
> the trace
> > > file gets fairly large. If you have other ideas what might work
> better I
> > > would be interested in hearing them.
> > >
> > >
> > > -------
> > > -bash-3.2$ ls -la trace.raw
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13238044416 Jul 7 23:02 trace.raw
> > > -bash-3.2$ xenalyze/xenalyze --cpu-hz=2.43G --summary trace.raw > out
> > >
> > > -------
> > > ..
> > > ..
> > > ..
> > > ..
> > > runstate_change old_runstate blocked, d1402v0 runstate runnable.
> Possible
> > > tsc skew.
> > > runstate_change old_runstate blocked, d1402v0 runstate runnable.
> Possible
> > > tsc skew.
> > > runstate_change old_runstate runnable, d1402v0 runstate running.
> Possible
> > > tsc skew.
> > > Not updating.
> > > FATAL: p->current null
> > > ] 20f101(20:f:101) 3 [ 802061ea ffffffff f ]
> > > -----
> > >
> > >
> > > Any help is appreciated,
> > > Thanks,
> > > Tom Graves
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-09 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-08 14:09 Xenalyze? Thomas Graves
2010-07-08 14:24 ` Xenalyze? George Dunlap
2010-07-08 14:46 ` Xenalyze? Thomas Graves
2010-07-08 16:36 ` Xenalyze? George Dunlap
2010-07-08 22:08 ` Xenalyze? Thomas Graves
2010-07-09 11:04 ` George Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C37023D.8010201@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tgraves@yahoo-inc.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.