From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grinberg@compulab.co.il (Igor Grinberg) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:14:22 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] cpufreq-pxa3xx: use HSIO 312MHz on the pxa310 In-Reply-To: <201007091031.44681.pieterg@gmx.com> References: <201007081904.01464.pieterg@gmx.com> <201007091031.44681.pieterg@gmx.com> Message-ID: <4C396F4E.3080704@compulab.co.il> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/09/10 11:31, pieterg wrote: > On Friday 09 July 2010 10:02:16 Eric Miao wrote: > >> What's wrong with 208MHz HSS on PXA310? >> > I haven't done any benchmarking, but Marvell found it worth to introduce > 312MHz for the pxa310. (I assume it might have something to do with the > video accelerator, which is unique to the pxa310). > > And to me it makes sense to use the highest supported speeds in the top > cpufreq entry. > > According to Marvell's PXA3xx Specification Update document (page 68 - SCr#3), the above is correct starting from silicon revision A2. What about earlier revisions? Shouldn't we support all of them? > Rgds, Pieter > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > > -- Regards, Igor.