From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: MMU: fix race between 'walk_addr' and 'fetch'
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:40:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C39E5D7.7030703@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C39BE90.1030802@redhat.com>
On 07/11/2010 03:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 01:45 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> 'walk_addr' is out of mmu_lock's protection, so while we handle 'fetch',
>> then guest's mapping has modifited by other vcpu's write path, such as
>> invlpg, pte_write and other fetch path
>>
>> Fixed by checking all level's mapping
>>
>>
>> @@ -319,22 +319,23 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> gva_t addr,
>> direct_access&= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
>>
>> for_each_shadow_entry(vcpu, addr, iterator) {
>> + bool nonpresent = false, last_mapping = false;
>> +
>
> I don't like these two new variables, but no suggestion at the
> moment. I'll try to simplify this loop later.
>
> One idea may be:
>
> while (level > walker.level) {
> handle indirect pages
> }
> while (level > hlevel) {
> handle direct pages
> }
> handle last spte
>
> I'm worried that this change is too big for backporting, but no
> suggestions on how to make it smaller, so we'll have to accept it.
Okay, I couldn't resist, posting this soon.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-11 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-06 10:44 [PATCH v5 1/9] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:45 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: MMU: fix race between 'walk_addr' and 'fetch' Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] export __get_user_pages_fast() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 12:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: MMU: fix race between 'walk_addr' and 'fetch' Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 15:40 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-07-06 10:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_pfn_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 11:22 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-07-06 11:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-09 1:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce gfn_to_page_many_atomic() function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 12:59 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 2:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-12 12:28 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 1:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] KVM: MMU: introduce pte_prefetch_topup_memory_cache() Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 13:05 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 3:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-12 12:26 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 1:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 4:21 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 4:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 5:35 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 5:48 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 6:05 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 6:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 6:29 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 6:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-13 7:45 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-06 10:50 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] KVM: MMU: prefetch ptes when intercepted guest #PF Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 10:51 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] KVM: MMU: combine guest pte read between fetch and pte prefetch Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-06 19:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-07 1:23 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-07 13:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-07 13:11 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-07 13:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-07 14:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-07 15:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-07-06 10:52 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] KVM: MMU: trace " Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-11 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] KVM: MMU: fix forgot reserved bits check in speculative path Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 2:37 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-12 13:15 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-13 1:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C39E5D7.7030703@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.