From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4C3B0CEB.7040906@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:39:07 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C3B07A2.4020606@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4C3B07A2.4020606@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] PCI id missing from arch/x86/smi.c List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Theo Veenker Cc: Xenomai help Theo Veenker wrote: > Hi, > > About a year ago when installing Xenomai on a new box it appeared this > particular system required an addition to the PDI IDs table in arch/x86/smi.c. > See this thread: https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2009-08/msg00031.html > Gilles said he would make the change to smi.c. That was with 2.4.8. > > Now I'm trying 2.5.3 but again the same PCI ID is missing. Is there a > particular reason not to include this ID? On this system the SMI detection > stuff doesn't work without it. > > It requires adding this line to rthal_smi_pci_tbl[]: > {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH10_1)}, Does the SMI disabling actually work, ie. do you _measure_ any difference? I'm asking as I think to remember that recent (but older than ICH10) Intel chipset no longer provide the required interface or at least changed it in an incompatible way. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux