[refpolicy] [ ssh patch 1/1] Some fixes in the ssh module with regard to userdom_user_home_content and ubac.

[domg472@gmail.com (Dominick Grift)]

On 07/12/2010 08:14 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 07/09/10 10:41, Dominick Grift wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Dominick Grift<domg472@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> :100644 100644 ef3f32d... 1a59f6a... M    policy/modules/services/ssh.if
>> :100644 100644 512834a... afbe9ac... M    policy/modules/services/ssh.te
>>   policy/modules/services/ssh.if |    4 +++-
>>   policy/modules/services/ssh.te |    1 -
>>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/policy/modules/services/ssh.if
>> b/policy/modules/services/ssh.if
>> index ef3f32d..1a59f6a 100644
>> --- a/policy/modules/services/ssh.if
>> +++ b/policy/modules/services/ssh.if
>> @@ -45,11 +45,13 @@ template(`ssh_basic_client_template',`
>>
>>       type $1_ssh_t;
>>       application_domain($1_ssh_t, ssh_exec_t)
>> +    ubac_constrained($1_ssh_t)
>> +
>>       role $3 types $1_ssh_t;
>>
>>       type $1_ssh_home_t;
>> -    files_type($1_ssh_home_t)
>>       typealias $1_ssh_home_t alias $1_home_ssh_t;
>> +    userdom_user_home_content($1_ssh_home_t)
>>
>>       ##############################
>>       #
> 
> I don't think we actually want this change.  The template isn't meant to
> be used by users; they use ssh_t.
> 

Is this not a template for ssh client application? Is that not an user
agent. Should user agents not be ubac_constrained?

Is $1_ssh_home_t not userdom_user_home_content. However you look at it?

>>   ##############################
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/attachments/20100712/3eb4d5df/attachment-0001.bin