All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Empty critical section issue in Bluetooth Linux driver code
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:50:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C3C4500.3090302@labri.fr> (raw)

Hi,

I have been using Coccinelle to validate some trivial rules of kernel
API use by device drivers.
I came accross the definition of an empty critical section in the
'bfusb_close' function in file drivers/bluetooth/bfusb.c

static int bfusb_close(struct hci_dev *hdev)
{
     ...
     write_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
     write_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);

     bfusb_unlink_urbs(data);
     bfusb_flush(hdev);

     return 0;
}
This excerpt is from Linux 2.6.34, but the same code has been prevailing
long before (I've seen it in 2.6.5)
So I was wondering if there is some code that is supposed to go between
write_lock_irqsave and write_unlock_irqsave,
or if the two statements should simply removed?
I also supposed that this was just meant to allow to wait for a release of the lock by another thread.
In this case, wouldn't spin_lock or mutex_lock be more appropriate as write_lock can be confusing even though
I suppose it has the same effect?? but I am not sure.

best regards,

-- 
Tegawendé F. Bissyandé
PhD student at LaBRI - France


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2010-07-13 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-13 10:50  [this message]
2010-07-13 11:38 ` Empty critical section issue in Bluetooth Linux driver code Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C3C4500.3090302@labri.fr \
    --to=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.