From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1OZh6H-00034d-Oo for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:20:57 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39847 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OZh6D-00034K-Q5 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:20:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZh6C-0007qv-JA for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:20:53 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:54816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZh6C-0007qX-E7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 05:20:52 -0400 Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so1407436bwz.0 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:20:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=QtI9WmDU3IwEYHvEFT4utNcsmS58AfrzEXu8t8/40NQ=; b=v+5aVFer0N+g3qKjBI2Ve58C4BnqAb1oMoxbOCizJDQQYNmm8g+TgI+UtXmxkvz5oy FsUdQ6u3x/wQ1v93ga+9X45r5EIjLfYdd4LYfWpIICBp9poI2E0duVsL/QHswXUubT4L hXuXDqZy07KVBJ3g44tXGlY4A3A2OIuXX0iNM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=NN4fjCtLLJnKab+6DJC1EUmEjeTwI8jGSRlO+qwHJ+P/Fb8BdovRk2ElfmGmuDOV7Y +LuFNGj5lvDN98+ybz2qEhDfjjVmDPmyS1OZg4IiFuFwR+Yp1skZnho5TEzd8VSYHs9n nea3DTqAJkkepBNo8VksZOd2Ox4GxuuG+TgNM= Received: by 10.204.85.89 with SMTP id n25mr704910bkl.105.1279271566888; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.bg45.phnet (113-120.203-62.cust.bluewin.ch [62.203.120.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm10054638bkr.19.2010.07.16.02.12.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C3F7094.30503@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:33:24 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100620 Icedove/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grub-devel@gnu.org References: <20100324142320.4804.63311.reportbug@localhost> <20100706171959.GA1165@riva.ucam.org> In-Reply-To: <20100706171959.GA1165@riva.ucam.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD03390F49A5EE89B1EBC1791" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: Bug#575252: grub-pc: black frame around the background image X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 09:20:55 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD03390F49A5EE89B1EBC1791 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/06/2010 07:19 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 03:23:20PM +0100, Francesco Muzio wrote: > =20 >> The last uploaded version of grub2 behaves bad with any resolution all= owed by vbeinfo >> >> The default background image /usr/share/images/desktop-base/moreblue-o= rbit-grub.png >> isn't showed in fullscreen but there is a black frame around the grub = menu >> =20 > (grub-devel: This was originally filed at > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D575252.) > > Yes, I see the same thing. This is because grub_gfxterm_fullscreen > hardcodes a 10-pixel border around the edge of the screen. If the > background is just plain black, then this is fine, but it's not very > helpful with a background image which tends to be designed for the full= > screen size. > > Of course designers *could* design for the full screen size minus 10 > pixels all round, but it seems a rather odd requirement to place on > them; the 10-pixel border should essentially be so that text isn't draw= n > too close to the edge of the screen, not so much to restrict the > background image. And, if you're arranging for the background image to= > stay on the screen and transition relatively smoothly into an OS splash= > screen, then the border looks actively weird: see > http://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/tmp/fbcon-handoff.ogv around 0:13= > for an example, as Plymouth repaints the whole background image without= > the black border. > > What's the best way to fix this? Perhaps the background_image command > should disregard the border? > > =20 The clean way would be to show image on the whole screen. It would require some code restructuring. It's just not high enough on the list of my priorities but I'll gladly accept the patch --=20 Regards Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko --------------enigD03390F49A5EE89B1EBC1791 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREKAAYFAkw/cJQACgkQNak7dOguQgns4QD+KmltQrRQe8Qb42FadsXZKmPS AaQd4G1zUr54udkbrucA/iCzPXBCzIyGZXQdFPqCS5BMCkAswyMkBcwXK9k8Ia75 =v1g0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD03390F49A5EE89B1EBC1791--