From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42860 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OZk1G-0008Sg-GS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:27:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZk1F-0002lg-0B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:27:58 -0400 Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174]:50958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZk1E-0002l7-OQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:27:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4C40503D.6090709@aurel32.net> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:27:41 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100715150011.GS18814@hall.aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [BUG?] Problem when emulate mips target on mips host List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: chen huacai Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org chen huacai a écrit : > Thank you for your information. > I'am a little confusing, cacheflush syscall you mentioned is in guest > or in host? > If you means syscall in guest, why x86 host can boot mips guest? > If you means syscall in host, why qemu-0.9.x doesn't crash? > On the host. I guess qemu-0.9.x doesn't crash, because it's not using TCG, so it doesn't write the code to memory the same way. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net