From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Reinhard Meyer <reinhard.meyer@emk-elektronik.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:32:30 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] New environment code
In-Reply-To: <20100717215536.7F1D2153A7F@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1279395948-25864-1-git-send-email-wd@denx.de>
	<20100717215536.7F1D2153A7F@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4C4291EE.5060102@emk-elektronik.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Just to give a datapoint for speed:
>
> measured on TQM5200 (MPC5200 at 400 MHz, environment size 16 kB):
>
> OLD implementation:
>
> 	=> sete ttt 'date;for i in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ; do for j in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ; do for k in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ; do run tt ; done ; done ; done;date'
> 	=> sete tt 'sete var1 xxx;sete var2 ${var1};sete var1 ${var2};sete var1;sete var2'
> 	=> run tt
> 	=> run ttt
> 	Date: 1910-07-17 (unknown day)    Time: 22:02:31
> 	Date: 1910-07-17 (unknown day)    Time: 22:03:27
>
> New implementation:
>
> 	=> run ttt
> 	Date: 1910-07-17 (unknown day)    Time: 20:45:51
> 	Date: 1910-07-17 (unknown day)    Time: 20:45:53
>
>   
<joke>I'd propose a contest for the most hilarious use of a 
BOOTLOADER.....</joke>

But, how does the timing look in the current implementation when the CRC 
calculation
is done only in the saveenv command?

Best Regards,
Reinhard