From: Konstantin Svist <fry.kun@gmail.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: messed up changing chunk size
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:45:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C43AE4E.2080802@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D891326971E54910A757A5BBB9EEDD74@m5>
Right now the reshape is at "32.1% (94138368/293033472)
finish=861.4min speed=3847K/sec"
Is it safe to reshape back right now, will it pick up the command?
On 07/18/2010 06:29 PM, Guy Watkins wrote:
> I think this should work:
> Put the chunk size back, resize the array to the original size, then run
> fsck and hope it did not need the data on the end that got trashed. Then
> shrink your file system first (by a really safe margin), then resize the
> array, then change chunk size. Then grow the file system to use the max
> allowed.
>
> Maybe the data on the end did not get trashed, but I don't know.
>
>
> } -----Original Message-----
> } From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-raid-
> } owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Konstantin Svist
> } Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 8:32 PM
> } To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> } Subject: messed up changing chunk size
> }
> } I've been playing around with RAID config and may have finally messed
> } it up.
> }
> } Initially, I created the array with 3 300G drives:
> } # mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=3 /dev/sda4
> } /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1
> } # mkfs.ext4 -v -m 0.01 -E stride=16,stripe-width=32 /dev/md0
> }
> } It's been working nicely so far, and I decided to add a 4th 300G drive:
> } # mdadm --grow --raid-devices=4 --backup-file=/root/grow_md0.bak /dev/md0
> }
> } That finished overnight, while I looked around and found that chunk size
> } of 512 should work better. I unmounted the FS and ran
> } # mdadm --grow -c 512 --backup-file=/root/grow_md0_rechunk.bak /dev/md0
> } mdadm: component size 293033536K is not a multiple of chunksize 512K
> }
> } so I sized it down a bit:
> } # mdadm --grow -z 293033472 --backup-file=/root/grow_md0_size.bak /dev/md0
> }
> } and then back to resizing chunks:
> } mdadm --grow -c 512 --backup-file=/root/grow_md0_rechunk.bak /dev/md0
> }
> } It's running right now:
> } # cat /proc/mdstat
> } Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> } md0 : active raid5 sdd1[3] sda4[0] sdc1[2] sdb1[1]
> } 293033472 blocks super 0.91 level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/4]
> } [UUUU]
> } [====>................] reshape = 22.7% (66540032/293033472)
> } finish=947.3min speed=3984K/sec
> }
> }
> } But just now I tried to mount the filesystem and it's failing:
> } EXT4-fs (md0): bad geometry: block count 146516768 exceeds size of
> } device (73258368 blocks)
> }
> } Here's the question, then: am I royally screwed or is my data still
> } there? How do I recover?
> }
> }
> }
> } Yes, in retrospect I should've probably checked around whether this
> } process has been successful for others.. but that's why they say
> } hindsight is 20/20
> }
> } --
> } To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> } the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> } More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-19 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-19 0:32 messed up changing chunk size Konstantin Svist
2010-07-19 0:41 ` Steven Haigh
2010-07-19 0:51 ` Konstantin Svist
2010-07-19 1:29 ` Guy Watkins
2010-07-19 1:45 ` Konstantin Svist [this message]
2010-07-19 1:51 ` Guy Watkins
2010-07-19 3:53 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-19 13:24 ` Jools Wills
2010-07-19 14:58 ` Roman Mamedov
2010-07-19 19:02 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-07-19 18:04 ` Konstantin Svist
2010-07-20 4:28 ` Konstantin Svist
2010-07-20 6:29 ` Konstantin Svist
2010-07-20 16:30 ` [SOLVED] " Konstantin Svist
2010-07-20 17:01 ` Konstantin Svist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C43AE4E.2080802@gmail.com \
--to=fry.kun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.