From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Re: xen_sched_clock problem in RHEL6b2, Was: [PATCH]
	x86: unconditionally mark TSC unstable under Xen
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:00:17 +0200
Message-ID: <4C43F801.40204@redhat.com>
References: <002b7702-f446-427f-8048-27d4edd7a51e@default>
	<4C43E9EC.9030007@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C43E9EC.9030007@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Michal Novotny <minovotn@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>, Jed Smith <jed@linode.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 07/19/2010 08:00 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> Andrew, could you please have a look this one? I don't know whether it's
> RHEL-6 kernel bug itself or whether there's some bug in the hypervisor,
> nevetheless both parts belongs to the same component - kernel-xen -
> you're working on so I guess you're a good guy to ask. Please, leave me
> in the CC list as I'm interested as well.

Yup, I've been watching this thread. I haven't seen anything strange
with my rhel6 testing yet, but Jeremy's explanation makes sense, so I'm
considering the patch.

Andrew