From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967008Ab0GSWFl (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:05:41 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:32376 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966846Ab0GSWFj (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:05:39 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,228,1278313200"; d="scan'208";a="536984218" Message-ID: <4C44CC2E.405@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:05:34 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Pannuto CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, akinobu.mita@gmail.com, sboyd@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] timer: Added usleep[_range][_interruptible] timer References: <4C44BB69.8050300@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <4C44BB69.8050300@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/19/2010 1:54 PM, Patrick Pannuto wrote: > *** INTRO *** > I like the general idea, but I kinda doubt the "interruptible" version makes sense for this... do you have any users for that in mind? if not... can we leave the interruptible version out... makes it simpler by a lot.