From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailrelay04.sunrise.ch ([194.158.229.47] helo=smtp-be-02.be08.sunrise.ch) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObArV-000782-W1 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:19:51 +0200 Received: from [192.168.26.14] (212-98-43-140.static.adslpremium.ch [212.98.43.140]) by smtp-be-02.be08.sunrise.ch (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id o6KBJZnH016604; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:19:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4C458674.5080802@vollmann.ch> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:20:20 +0200 From: Detlef Vollmann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <20100709204055.GA12163@excalibur.local> <20100720070108.GE1512@excalibur.local> <20100720084026.GI1512@excalibur.local> In-Reply-To: <20100720084026.GI1512@excalibur.local> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 194.158.229.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dv@vollmann.ch X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] New stable branch (and maybe a new process?) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:19:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/20/10 10:40, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 10:09, Koen Kooi wrote: >> The biggest problem is the .dev is halfway into big changes, e.g. >> halfway into new-style staging, > > Agreed. While I think we are more then halfway through with this. Recipes are > left but most of the active maintained are already done. NO numbers but my > feeling here. > >> halfway into packaged-staging rework, halfway into nativesdk, etc. > > These both are ongoing for quite some time already. I have to admit that I lost > track where they stand and what is still outstanding. > > So your suggestion is to wait until all three are done? That would be my suggestion. What "done" exactly means is a separate issue. Detlef