From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObCbJ-00073T-6b for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:11:28 +0200 Received: (qmail 10405 invoked by uid 1003); 20 Jul 2010 13:11:00 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@127.0.0.1) by mail.geekisp.com with SMTP; 20 Jul 2010 13:10:59 -0000 Message-ID: <4C45A062.6080606@balister.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:10:58 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <20100709204055.GA12163@excalibur.local> <20100720070108.GE1512@excalibur.local> <20100720084026.GI1512@excalibur.local> In-Reply-To: <20100720084026.GI1512@excalibur.local> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.168.135.169 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philip@balister.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] New stable branch (and maybe a new process?) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:11:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/20/2010 04:40 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 10:09, Koen Kooi wrote: >> On 20-07-10 09:01, Stefan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> From the silence on this topic I gather that the interest to create a new branch >>> or change the process is quite low. >> >> I have an interest in a new stable branch, but no interest in changing >> the process. > > Fair enough. Lets handle the issues seperately for now. > >> The biggest problem is the .dev is halfway into big changes, e.g. >> halfway into new-style staging, > > Agreed. While I think we are more then halfway through with this. Recipes are > left but most of the active maintained are already done. NO numbers but my > feeling here. > >> halfway into packaged-staging rework, halfway into nativesdk, etc. > > These both are ongoing for quite some time already. I have to admit that I lost > track where they stand and what is still outstanding. > > So your suggestion is to wait until all three are done? We should identify the work in progress in dev and decide which ones we should finish before creating a new staging. There is no sense making a new stable branch and then creating a major diversion from dev that will make maintaining both in parallel for as long as possible difficult. Philip